Wizard Tracker · 10,000 Bitcoin Wizards

1,609 / 10,000 wizards inscribed

16.1% of the collection · minting since Jul 2025 · latest mint 26 Aug 2026 · updated 27 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC

Inscription progresssince the first mint

Latest mintsnewest first, straight from the chain

#1609Join The Cultxgodx · 26 Aug11,731 sats to inscribeblock 9 sat

#1608Answering The Pressrobbyn_ord · 26 Aug11,731 sats to inscribeblock 9 sat

#1607Behind The Blockchainfayroz · 26 Aug11,731 sats to inscribeblock 9 sat

#1606Nocturnal Sat StackerG1ena · 26 Aug11,731 sats to inscribeblock 9 sat

#1605Fine Art MaxiG1ena · 26 Aug11,731 sats to inscribeblock 9 sat

#1604Sunk Below SupportG1ena · 26 Aug12,929 sats to inscribe

#1603Holding After Deathfayroz · 26 Aug12,929 sats to inscribe

#1602Stars Align Bullishfayroz · 26 Aug12,929 sats to inscribe

#1601Marching To Moonrobbyn_ord · 26 Aug12,929 sats to inscribeblock 9 sat

#1600Lost It (not)Satoshi Gakamoto · 26 Aug12,929 sats to inscribeblock 9 sat

#1599Street Art SorceressSatoshi Gakamoto · 26 Aug10,120 sats to inscribe

#1598Hidden Gem Foundceel · 26 Aug10,120 sats to inscribeblock 9 sat

The sats underneathwhat each wizard is inscribed on

Magic Internet Money · inscription #70 the 70th inscription ever made · 23 Jan 2023 · block 773,205 Every wizard is its child: each mint spends #70’s UTXO in its reveal, and that spend is the on-chain proof of parenthood, the same spend the mempool section watches for.

Ordinals are carved onto specific satoshis, and the sats chosen for this collection carry history of their own. 893 of 1,609 wizards (56%) sit on sats mined in block 9, January 2009: coins Satoshi Nakamoto sent to Hal Finney in Bitcoin’s first transaction. The rest sit on ordinary sats mined in 2013. It is decided per wizard, marked on every card, and any explorer can verify it.

Spent inscribing0.243 BTC 24,335,032 sats in inscription fees

Bitcoin blocks449 inscribed across 10 difficulty epochs

Top artists102 artists total

197

180

137

121

31 flagged for exclusion dropped from the final index

180total wizards without artistsmetadata is permanent, so a missing credit can never be added after the fact

Irregularities exclusion list for the final indexation

These inscriptions have problems (duplicate artwork or broken metadata) that make them unfit for the final index. They stay listed here so every call can be reviewed by the community before the exclusion list is applied. On-chain metadata cannot be edited, so a broken wizard is fixed by inscribing it again and excluding the broken one. Cosmetic notices are left out; run wizard_audit.py for the full report.

Check	Action	Findings	Wizards
Identical artwork inscribed more than once	exclude	23	46
Description is a handle and a number, not a title	exclude	8	8
Description reused across wizards	notification	18	39
No artist credited	notification	180	180

Download exclusions.json

Identical artwork inscribed more than once

›exclude23 findings · 46 wizards

The same picture inscribed more than once: same drawing, same colours. Some are identical byte for byte and confirmed by hash; the rest were re-saved between inscriptions, so the bytes differ and they were confirmed by comparing the decoded images, then by eye. A recolour is not listed here: it counts as a different wizard.

Order:

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy: identical pixels, credited to a different artist). The original is #13; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy: identical pixels, retitled by the same artist). The original is #49; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions share the exact same image bytes (sha256 644375b0a2abc3aa…). The original is #70; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

Show the other 20 findings

2 inscriptions share the exact same image bytes (sha256 505d1db88bcd548d…). The original is #71; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions share the exact same image bytes (sha256 db33f55f91c86109…). The original is #72; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy: identical pixels, credited to a different artist). The original is #78; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy: identical pixels, retitled by the same artist). The original is #124; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy: identical pixels, retitled by the same artist). The original is #125; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy: identical pixels, retitled by the same artist). The original is #132; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy: identical pixels, retitled by the same artist). The original is #137; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy: identical pixels, retitled by the same artist). The original is #149; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy: identical pixels, retitled; the copy also lost its artist credit to the pipeline). The original is #168; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy: identical pixels, retitled by the same artist). The original is #195; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy: identical pixels, retitled; the copy also lost its artist credit to the pipeline). The original is #214; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions share the exact same image bytes (sha256 2310fc99c4ec60ed…). The original is #296; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions share the exact same image bytes (sha256 f3a1e5106f1270ec…). The original is #375; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy: identical pixels, same title, same artist). The original is #428; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy: identical pixels, retitled by the same artist). The original is #467; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy: identical pixels, retitled by the same artist). The original is #471; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions are the same picture in the same colours (re-encoded copy of the crown group's 'Join us' palette (see not_duplicates): identical pixels, retitled by the same artist). The original is #480; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions share the exact same image bytes (sha256 1d8e2f87a755abf8…). The original is #965; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions share the exact same image bytes (sha256 6dac3adf8885838d…). The original is #966; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 inscriptions share the exact same image bytes (sha256 17cd7e2eba303a1c…). The original is #968; the rest are copies.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

Description is a handle and a number, not a title

›exclude8 findings · 8 wizards

The description field holds an artist handle and a submission number instead of a wizard title.

Order:

"michellexxxx #85904" looks like an artist handle plus a submission number that was pasted into the description field by mistake. It needs a real wizard title.

"blockwanden #86924" looks like an artist handle plus a submission number that was pasted into the description field by mistake. It needs a real wizard title.

"blockwanden #86483" looks like an artist handle plus a submission number that was pasted into the description field by mistake. It needs a real wizard title.

Show the other 5 findings

"robbyn.ord #92240" looks like an artist handle plus a submission number that was pasted into the description field by mistake. It needs a real wizard title.

"cultistoff #82222" looks like an artist handle plus a submission number that was pasted into the description field by mistake. It needs a real wizard title.

"blockwanden #89485" looks like an artist handle plus a submission number that was pasted into the description field by mistake. It needs a real wizard title.

"blockwanden #84795" looks like an artist handle plus a submission number that was pasted into the description field by mistake. It needs a real wizard title.

"blockwanden #84791" looks like an artist handle plus a submission number that was pasted into the description field by mistake. It needs a real wizard title.

Description reused across wizards

›notification18 findings · 39 wizards

The same description on more than one wizard: the way a re-inscribed copy shows up when the image was re-saved.

Order:

2 wizards share the description "goodnight, chain"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 wizards share the description "staff of sats"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 wizards share the description "wired for wealth"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

Show the other 15 findings

3 wizards share the description "this is fine"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

3 wizards share the description "number go up"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 wizards share the description "vires in numeris"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 wizards share the description "all in bitcoin"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

3 wizards share the description "magic internet money"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 wizards share the description "locked and loaded"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 wizards share the description "welcome to mempool"; same artist, so it is worth checking whether it is the same wizard inscribed twice. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 wizards share the description "all that glitters"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 wizards share the description "back to work"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 wizards share the description "cpu mining era"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 wizards share the description "pull the lever"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 wizards share the description "laser eyes activated"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 wizards share the description "no second best"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 wizards share the description "join the cult"; same artist, so it is worth checking whether it is the same wizard inscribed twice. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →

2 wizards share the description "glowing with gains"; by different artists, so this may just be a coincidence of wording rather than a copy. Compare the artwork before deciding: a shared title alone is not a duplicate.

Click either wizard to compare them closely →